This week’s
tutorial task was interesting, I must say. I never knew there were checklists
in evaluating materials till I joined this course, so it was something new for
me. J We
were required to give a presentation base on the checklist we were given,
chose. We were given a choice on which author’s checklist we would like to
present on; not knowing that it’d be one of the toughest checklists to
understand, we chose the author with what we thought had the most interesting
name, Andrew Littlejohn.
I struggled
really hard the first time I read the article on Littlejohn’s checklist, I
couldn’t understand what it was about and I found it hard to focus while reading.
I realised just reading the article didn't help; so I decided to highlight
important points and make annotations. After that, re-reading it for around four times really allowed me to understand the main points, and I realised it
wasn't as tough as I thought it would be.
As I was
trying to understand Littlejohn’s article, it was interesting to see how he
introduces the framework and how there are different levels in analysing the
materials. I felt that it was helpful that he arranged it in a way that there
are different levels in analysing, first the explicit nature of the material, then he
slowly moves in to a more specific/deeper level of analysis. I really like this
checklist as it looks at every aspect of the material. However, seeing so many criteria/features in the checklist, I do think that
it can be time consuming.
Through
this tutorial task, I found out the importance of evaluating a material. Teachers
will be able to see what the material lacks, they can also improve the materials
to suit the classroom and to achieve learning objectives. However, I feel that the
checklist can only do so much in how effective a material can be, the rest belongs
to the effort a teacher puts in order to produce a good material. I would
definitely try to use this checklist
in the future in hopes of providing my future learners a better language learning material. J
*This reflection was written on the 5th of November. The date was changed because I thought it'd be better if it was posted after the respective task.
0 comments:
Post a Comment